Livestock Grazing and Range Management
Photographer: Mary O'Brien
Note: In order to detect differences between Alternatives B, C, and D for livestock grazing, it was necessary to do a word search in text for “FW-RANGE-“ within the section on Environmental Consequences. The DEIS contains no chart comparing provisions of Alternatives B, C, D for livestock grazing.
GOALS
Conservation Alternative Goals (FW-RANGE-GL): 01-03
Proposed Management Plan (Management Plan, Vol. 1) Goals (FW-RANGE-GL): 01-03
Description of Alternatives: All, B, C, D (DEIS, Vol. 2) Goals
DESIRED CONDITIONS
Conservation Alternative Desired Conditions (FW-RANGE-DC): 01-09
Proposed Management Plan (Management Plan, Vol. 1) Desired Conditions (FW-RANGE-DC): 01-02
OBJECTIVES
Conservation Alternative Objectives (FW-RANGE-OB): 01-06
Proposed Management Plan (Management Plan, Vol. 1) Objectives (FW-RANGE-OB): 01-04
Description of Alternatives: All, B, C, D (DEIS, Vol. 2) Objectives (FW-RANGE-OB)
STANDARDS
Conservation Alternative Standards (FW-RANGE-ST): 01-21
Proposed Management Plan (Management Plan, Vol. 1) Standards (FW-RANGE-ST): 01-02
Alternatives C (DEIS, Vol. 2) Standards (FW-RANGE-ST)
GUIDELINES
Conservation Alternative Guidelines (FW-RANGE-GD):01-06
Proposed Management Plan (Management Plan, Vol. 1) Guidelines (FW-RANGE-GD): 01-07
Description of Alternatives: All, B, C, D (DEIS, Vol. 2) Guidelines (FW-RANGE-GD)
The DEIS does not compare livestock grazing/range alternatives A, B, C, and D side-by-side. The only charts comparing the alternatives are for the three issues the Forest felt are significant: (Issue 1: Sustainable Recreation; Issue 2: Traditional and cultural ways of life; and Issue 3: Ecological Resilience). Livestock grazing appears in two of the 23 rows comparing the forest plan alternatives. The row in Table 2.6-3 is particularly confusing:
ABOUT THIS COMPARISON
All text in this chart is copied and pasted from the Conservation Alternative, the MLNF proposed Management Plan, and the MLNF DEIS except for any text in brackets and in italics font.
YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED TEXT
BLUE HIGHLIGHTED TEXT
GREEN HIGHLIGHTED TEXT
Note only two (minor) Standards in the DEIS to manage the entire livestock use throughout nearly 100% of the MLNF. Note also the extremely weak Guidelines (e.g., 4” stubble height at the “greenline”, which is the immediate edge between a streambank and the stream and does not include the much broader riparian area).
Comentarios